Added section geometric optics to optics.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3fa7e89daf
commit
bce634b7a3
1 changed files with 196 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -1 +1,196 @@
|
|||
# Geometric optics
|
||||
# Geometric optics
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: surfaces that reflect or refract rays leaving a source point $s$ to a conjugate point $p$ are defined as Cartesian surfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: a perfect image of a point is possible with a stigmatic system. For the set of conjugated points no diffraction and abberations occur, obtaining reversible rays.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Assumption*: in geometric optics use will be made of the paraxial approximation that states that for small angles $\theta$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \tan \theta \approx \sin \theta \approx \theta,
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> and
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \cos \theta \approx 1,
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> comes down to using the first term of the Taylor series approximation.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
## Spherical surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
> *Law*: for a spherical reflecting interface in paraxial approximation the relation between the object and image distance $s_{o,i} \in \mathbb{R}$ and the radius $R \in \mathbb{R}$ of the interface is given by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \frac{1}{s_o} + \frac{1}{s_i} = \frac{2}{R}
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with $n_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}$ the index of refraction of the incident and transmitted medium.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: for a object distance $s_0 \to \infty$ we let the image distance $s_i = f$ with $f \in \mathbb{R}$ the focal length defining the focal point of the spherical interface.
|
||||
|
||||
Then it follows from the definition that
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\frac{1}{s_o} + \frac{1}{s_i} = \frac{1}{f}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
> *Law*: for a spherical refracting interface in paraxial approximation the relation between the object and image distance $s_{o,i} \in \mathbb{R}$ and the radius $R \in \mathbb{R}$ of the interface is given by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \frac{n_i}{s_o} + \frac{n_t}{s_i} = \frac{n_t - n_i}{R}
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with $n_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}$ the index of refraction of the incident and transmitted medium.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: the transverse magnification $M$ for a optical system is defined as
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> M = \frac{y'}{y}
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with $y, y' \in \mathbb{R}$ the object and image size.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Corollary*: the transverse magnification $M$ for a spherical refracting interface in paraxial approximation is by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> M = - \frac{n_i s_i}{n_t s_o},
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with $s_{o,i} \in \mathbb{R}$ the object and image distance and $n_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}$ the index of refraction of the incident and transmitted medium.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: a lens is defined by two intersecting spherical interfaces with radius $R_1, R_2 \in \mathbb{R}$ respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Law*: for a thin lens in paraxial approximation the radii $R_1, R_2 \in \mathbb{R}$ are related to the focal length $f \in \mathbb{R}$ of the lens by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \frac{1}{f} = \frac{n_t - n_i}{n_i} \bigg( \frac{1}{R_1} - \frac{1}{R_2} \bigg),
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with $n_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}$ the index of refraction of the incident and transmitted medium.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> With the transverse magnification $M$ given by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> M = - \frac{s_i}{s_o},
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> with the object and image distance $s_{o,i} \in \mathbb{R}$.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sign convention
|
||||
|
||||
Converging optics have positive focal lengths and diverging optics have negative focal lengths.
|
||||
|
||||
Objects are located left of the optic by a positive object distance and images are located right of the optic by a positive image distance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ray tracing
|
||||
|
||||
> *Assumption*: using paraxial approximation and assuming that all optical elements have rotational symmetry and are aligned coaxially along a single optical axis.
|
||||
|
||||
A ray matrix model may be introduced where the ray is defined according to its intersection with a reference plane.
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: a ray may be defined by its intersection with a reference plane by
|
||||
>
|
||||
> * the parameter $y \in \mathbb{R}$ is the perpendicular distance between the optical axis and the intersection point,
|
||||
> * the angle $\theta \in [0, 2\pi)$ is the angle the ray makes with the horizontal.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Proposition*: for the translation of the ray between two reference planes within the same medium seperated by a horizontal distance $d \in \mathbb{R}$ the relation
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \begin{pmatrix} y_2 \\ \theta_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & d \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} y_1 \\ \theta_1 \end{pmatrix},
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> holds, for $y_{1,2} \in \mathbb{R}$ and $\theta_{1,2} \in [0, 2\pi)$.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
<br>
|
||||
|
||||
> *Proposition*: for the reflection of the ray at the plane of incidence at a spherical interface of radius $R \in \mathbb{R}$ the relation
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \begin{pmatrix} y_2 \\ \theta_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 2 / R & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} y_1 \\ \theta_1 \end{pmatrix},
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> holds, for $y_{1,2} \in \mathbb{R}$ and $\theta_{1,2} \in [0, 2\pi)$.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
This matrix may also be given in terms of the focal length $f \in \mathbb{R}$ by
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ f & 1 \end{pmatrix}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
> *Proposition*: fir the refraction of the ray at the plane of incidence at a spherical interfance of radius $R \in \mathbb{R}$ the relation
|
||||
>
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
> \begin{pmatrix} y_2 \\ \theta_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ - \frac{n_t - n_i}{n_t R} & \frac{n_i}{n_t} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} y_1 \\ \theta_1 \end{pmatrix}
|
||||
> $$
|
||||
>
|
||||
> holds, for $y_{1,2} \in \mathbb{R}$, $\theta_{1,2} \in [0, 2\pi)$ and $n_{i,t} \in \mathbb{R}$ the index of refraction of the incident and transmitted medium.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
This matrix may also be given in terms of the focal length $f \in \mathbb{R}$ by
|
||||
|
||||
$$
|
||||
\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ -\frac{1}{f} & 1 \end{pmatrix}.
|
||||
$$
|
||||
|
||||
> *Law*: the ray mtarix model taken as a linear sequence of interfaces and translations can be used to model optical systems of arbitrary complexity under the posed assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
??? note "*Proof*:"
|
||||
|
||||
Will be added later.
|
||||
|
||||
## Abberations
|
||||
|
||||
> *Definition*: an abberation is any effect that prevents a lens from forming a perfect image.
|
||||
|
||||
Various abberations could be
|
||||
|
||||
* Spherical abberation: error of the paraxial approximation.
|
||||
* Chromatic abberation: error due to different index of refraction for different wavelengths of light.
|
||||
* Astigmatism: deviation from the cylindrical symmetry.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue